Links one Polymarket profile and posts slips and results. Until July 2026 its posted bets came from accounts it had not linked.
@itskkoma linked one public Polymarket profile, from July 2026. Nine wallets traded behind its record; seven are tied to it by its own posts. Until then its posted bets came from accounts it had not linked, and it showed wins far more often than losses. It said openly that it has several accounts.
In fairness
Betting on both sides was checked: none of its nine wallets ever held the opposite side to another.
It often wrote about its losses (‘Lost about 4.5k today’), and on 2026-07-05 it wrote the bet off before the result.
Show the record5 points and their sources
What the record shows
1The slips and results it posted until July 2026 match trades in five accounts it did not link; it said it wanted no copy traders. Those five and its public profile together lost about $8,000.
Its slip of 2026-03-29. The only matching trade is in mememez, an account it never linked as its profile.
1 more source
2It changed accounts after losing days and announced each change. Its public profile starts after about $1.1 million of bets on earlier accounts. It wrote: ‘I legit have them cause I hate seeing negative PNL.’
Its post of 2026-07-11.
3 more sources
3On 2026-07-05 it posted a $700 bet from its new public profile. 57 minutes earlier, about $29,700 had gone on the same outcome in an account it had not named.
4 more sources
4It posted about 23% of its winning bets with figures, but only about 8% of its losing ones. None of its 25 biggest losses was posted with figures.
A results post of 2026-01-11.
2 more sources
5It promoted DG3 in 32 posts with no words of sponsorship. DG3’s affiliate wallet sent $3,750 to a fresh wallet, which passed $1,000 on to one of its accounts. Who holds that wallet is unknown.
It told readers it trades on DG3 for rebates, as here on 2026-07-09.
2 more sources
Accounts tied to @itskkoma
Payments received
Deleted posts, for example
Everything that must be said with these points
- The handle told its audience that it has several accounts: ‘This is my 3rd account on @Polymarket’ (2026-07-11 06:27 UTC), and the same day, asked ‘How many accounts do u have’, ‘Like 7’ (2026-07-11 19:20 UTC; 8 of these wallets had traded by then); ‘across all my accounts’ (2026-07-14, 2026-07-20).
- It gave its reasons in public: no copy traders, privacy, a ‘fresh start’.
- Every wallet has its own owner key: the chain shows keys paying each other’s deposits and receiving each other’s withdrawals, not who holds a key.
- For ‘-.-x’ and the app wallet the tie is the money route alone; the handle shares picks with friends and in group chats, so a friend’s account is not excluded for those two by anything but that route.
- blposdpaodpsd only passed money through; bvcketLocks (created 2026-09-30) never traded and has not been presented by the handle.
- DG3’s public rebates table lists nononononoononono and the public profile under the usernames itskkoma2 and itskkom3; those usernames are chosen by whoever registers.
- The two owner keys were posted as pages of the handle’s own (a collection page on thecolony.xyz and an Ethos profile) in 2024 and January 2025, long before these Polymarket profiles existed; the profile names and trading wallets themselves were never posted except itskkoma and the name mememez in one screenshot.
- Not linking the account was a stated choice: ‘I personally don’t cause I don’t like the idea of people just monitoring my wins and losses’ (2026-04-18); ‘i dont like sharing my username publicly cause i dont want copytraders but i can send it to you privately’ (2026-06-21); ‘People have asked for my poly account to copy trade and I politely decline’ (2026-06-05).
- From 2026-07-07 the handle said it had several accounts (‘across multiple accounts’, ‘my 3rd account’, ‘Like 7’).
- The name mememez was visible once, in a screenshot the handle posted on 2026-03-24, five days before the slip; nononononoononono is listed in DG3’s public user table under ‘itskkoma2’ (not by the handle).
- Two owner keys of these accounts were posted by the handle as its own pages before the Polymarket period: 0x5d59e145f6f0bf51151083f44ef60f691391f1cd (BTTS; 2024-06-23 and 2024-06-24, ‘My collection’) and 0xbb0898e2a5da4c85729b584d064fd35548087082 (alwayslosings, whose key funded the keys of justtryingtowin and BothTeamToScore; 2025-01-21, ‘Here’s my Ethos profile’, now removed).
- The six accounts have six different owner keys; what ties them to the handle is the posted slips and cards (figures that occur in one wallet only), its own words, the name mememez on its screenshot, transfers and declared withdrawal routes between the keys and the referral rewards.
- The posts include losses (‘Games I lost’, 2026-01-11; the lost sixth ticket of 2026-06-26). Only some posts were matched one by one; which share of wins and losses was shown is counted separately.
- The link of BTTS to the posts rests on one image of three positions and on its owner key, not on a result card.
- Results on other venues (Kalshi before 2025-12-10, a sportsbook from July 2026) are not visible.
- The profit panel of 2026-03-31 comes from a third-party tool and is within 34.25 dollars of mememez’s record, not equal to it.
- The handle announced the changes as they happened: ‘I made a new account’ (2026-06-21), ‘i tilted really hard on my og account and needed a “fresh” start so made a new one’ (2026-06-30), ‘going to make poly account profile public (new) and start from “zero” again’ (2026-07-04).
- It said it had several accounts in July 2026, before 2026-08-04: ‘across multiple accounts’ (2026-07-07), ‘my 3rd account’ and ‘Like 7’ (2026-07-11), ‘across all my accounts’ (2026-07-14); asked what happened to the first two accounts it wrote ‘They did great tilted and neeeded a fresh start. It’s more psychological than farming’ (2026-07-11), which may be meant ironically and is quoted as written.
- Its stated reasons are privacy, tilt and a referral link (‘Whoever tricked me into clicking their @Polymarket referral link – no more fees for you’, 2026-06-21).
- It posted bets of the earlier accounts while they were in use, losses included (‘Games I lost’, 2026-01-11; ‘I lost a huge amount few days ago’, 2026-06-21). What it did not give were the account names (mememez appears once, in a screenshot of 2026-03-24) and a result per account.
- ‘I hate seeing negative PNL’ is about what the handle sees on its own screen; that is all the sentence says.
- The reply of 2026-08-03 answered a post of another X handle about the handle’s accounts; it was live on 2026-08-03 18:19:01 UTC and gone on 2026-10-01; when and why it was removed is not known.
- Opening a new account breaks no rule found; signing it up under one’s own referral link is a separate matter between the account and Polymarket.
- The accounts overlap in places (nononononoononono made small test trades in May; alwayslosings traded twice; ‘-.-x’ was used for one night).
- Both accounts were on the same side (Over): this is not a hedge, and no fill between them exists.
- The handle did not present the small win as its result: five minutes before the large block was sold it told its readers ‘Looks like this over will not happen’ (20:52:45 UTC), and it posted no result of a bet on either match.
- What the post showed was the size: the $700 card was a real position, and the post did not say it was the whole stake.
- It is one night, not a standing practice: after 2026-07-05 the only positions found on the other accounts are two of $10.00 (2026-07-24) and one of $227.07 (2026-08-20), plus 1,831.67 dollars of buys on the app wallet on 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-27, while the public profile bought for 203,167.01 dollars up to 2026-09-28.
- From the moment the public profile record existed the other wallets opened 8 positions costing 102,016.55 (result +16,943.22); one more, 10,008.41 on ‘Paraguay vs. France: O/U 1.5’, was opened and lost in the hour before the profile record was created.
- Two days later (2026-07-07) the handle wrote of its results ‘around the same across multiple accounts net net’, and on 2026-07-11 that it has ‘Like 7’ accounts.
- ‘-.-x’ has its own owner key (0x7de5ea7dd428cbc1df8680b45c9fbdcb7c2e1879) and no image of it was ever posted; it is tied to the handle by the money route only: funded only from the public profile, winnings withdrawn to the key the handle had linked as ‘My collection’ on 2024-06-24, 89,171.42 paid from that key into the public profile 42 minutes later, and its last 60.00 sent to the same key on 2026-09-28.
- Splitting a stake across accounts has ordinary reasons (size on a watched profile, order size, rebates per wallet); the handle had said it did not want copy traders, and the large order carried DG3’s builder code on the wallet DG3’s public table lists under the username itskkoma2.
- The card is read from the image of the post of 19:52:12 UTC (‘itskkoma / Over / Cost $700 / Odds 57% / To win $1,229’); the post text itself names no stake.
- The handle did state losses in words: 68 posts read one by one, among them ‘Lost a good chunk of my profit on brazil/haiti over 3.5 goals yesterday’ (2026-06-20, one of its largest losses), ‘Lost about 4.5k today’ (2026-06-10), ‘a series of losses has really wrecked my overall profit’ (2026-07-04) and ‘Took two big shots fading Tien and got absolutely crushed’ (2026-08-09).
- Most of its largest wins were not shown with figures either (16 of 25).
- A result card or a ‘Redeem’ screen exists only for a win, so posts made after the result lean towards wins by their nature.
- The calls a reader could have followed at entry time won more often than the book as a whole (54 won, 21 lost, 72.0%, against 63.6%): nothing here shows that followers lost by copying.
- The handle declined copy-trading more than once (‘This is why I don’t want people copy trading me’, 2026-06-10) and wrote that it is ‘Not a professional capper by any means’ (2026-08-07).
- The matching is rule-based; 414 images that the post record withholds were not read, which lowers both shares. The post record covers about 98 to 99% of the account’s own posts in 2026.
- The +$145,000 is a sum of the positions shown; the handle never stated it.
- This is a statement about Polymarket’s order book. The same keys moved money to a casino and sportsbook venue whose bets are not public: nothing shows an offsetting bet there, and it cannot be excluded.
- The comparison group is 57 other accounts of a comparison set, not a random sample: among 489 pairs of them that met in a market the book traded, 124 (25.4%) held only opposite outcomes and 256 (52.4%) were mixed.
- The volume of the accounts was not built by trading with each other.
- The tie between the show and DG3 was visible to readers: ‘We are live on @gmpm_xyz with @DG3_terminal !’ (2026-06-22), the short link itself (tinyurl.com/DG3xGMPM), and the show’s post of 2026-07-29, which the handle reposted, naming DG3 under ‘Powered by’ beside Stitch3 and bvcket.
- The handle told its readers that it trades on DG3 for rebates: ‘Traded on @DG3_terminal cause I get some rebates as well’ (2026-07-09), ‘win-win situation of generating volume on @Polymarket with rebates from dg3’ (2026-07-10), ‘Earned around $1,000 so far’ (2026-07-24), ‘Made it through @DG3_terminal to be eligible for more rebates’ (2026-07-25); and it called the link a ‘ref link’ (2026-07-09).
- On 2026-07-07, two days before the 1,000 USDT0, it wrote: ‘Anything I posted related to prediction markets projects, I did not get paid (unless disclosed)’. 20 of the 32 posts and 10 of the 14 link posts came after the 1,000 USDT0.
- The same intermediate wallet sent 1,000 USDT0 three hours later to 0x0cbba3d81ee3a4609dd92376fecfa62b3094ff66 (the main funder of the DG3 account registered under the show’s name ‘gmpm’, whose holder is not shown) and on 2026-06-19 three payments of about 100 USDC on Base, one of them (100.25) to 0x7285cfe3d63214fed929d302013cb02d18da897a, the owner key of blposdpaodpsd. A show receiving a sponsor’s money and sharing it among its hosts would look like this, and that is ordinary; a private settlement between other parties is not excluded by the chain either.
- DG3’s rebates are open to every trader (‘No applications. No approvals.’) and DG3’s page lists both accounts as rebate recipients; the 943.98 PUSD of DG3 money paid directly into the accounts fits that ladder.
- The handle marks other posts as sponsored or not in words (‘Partnering with BitMEX on this one!’, ‘Me openly sharing my @Polymarket slips knowing I’m not sponsored’) and wrote ‘I rather be washed than do undisclosed shills’ (2026-08-01).
- X’s paid-partnership label cannot be read for posts before 2026-08-09, so a label on these posts cannot be ruled out.
Polymarket Sports
