Browse the records
Polymarket KOL records
Public posts, trades and payments, with sources and the limits of each finding.
13 records
No records match. Try another handle or clear the filters.
@0xBumblebee
Posts picks, claim cards and app tips. A second account it funded lost about $8,300, and no post shows that account's trades.
Read the record for @0xBumblebee→In fairness
It often posted its overall losses, and told followers in general terms that its X account was paid.
Betting on both sides was checked across its nine addresses. It did not.
@0xd1namit
Builds the PolyHelper app and says so. PolyHelper money reached the address @gusik4ever's accounts cash out to, hours before two livestreams it posted about.
Read the record for @0xd1namit→In fairness
What the $650 was for is not recorded; part may have been prize money for the streams.
Betting on both sides was checked and not found.
@_kate_lv
Posts bets from many betting apps. For most of the bets it posted, an account tied to it by money held the opposite side.
Read the record for @_kate_lv→In fairness
It described betting both sides on two accounts in public in 2025 ('u bet equal monies and make volume on both accs') and listed five of its wallets in July 2026.
It says openly that it takes paid deals. Since August 2026 its main Bagel posts and a Firefly post carry X's paid-partnership label.
@aenews
Posts its Polymarket bets. A wallet tied to its account by money proposes how markets ended; 67 times, an @aenews account then bought that outcome.
Read the record for @aenews→In fairness
Anyone may propose a result, a proposal needs a bond, and the oracle, not the proposer, settles disputes.
It posts its positions and losses in public, and has said that it files disputes.
@bober_smart
Promoted $25 becoming $12,398. The full paired trade made about $4,113 before gas.
Read the record for @bober_smart→In fairness
The video shows real figures, and the trader made money. Purchases were cumulative, not money tied up all at once.
The post may reflect a misunderstanding. Payment, referral earnings and deliberate deception are not established.
@gusik4ever
Called itself Polymarket's Sports Community Lead. The result images it posts show almost only wins; its accounts lost money.
Read the record for @gusik4ever→In fairness
It said in public that it has a second account and that it loses: 'this is my main account, and yeah, it’s in the red right now'.
Betting on both sides was checked; its accounts did not bet against each other.
@itskkoma
Links one Polymarket profile and posts slips and results. Until July 2026 its posted bets came from accounts it had not linked.
Read the record for @itskkoma→In fairness
Betting on both sides was checked: none of its nine wallets ever held the opposite side to another.
It often wrote about its losses ('Lost about 4.5k today'), and on 2026-07-05 it wrote the bet off before the result.
@mikocrypto11
Promoted $24 and $25 weather bets returning over $12,000. The complete paired trades made about $4,113 and $837 before gas.
Read the record for @mikocrypto11→In fairness
The figures shown are real, and the trader made money. The posts describe individual trades, not an account that began with $24 or $25. Cumulative purchases are not money tied up all at once.
A misunderstanding remains possible. Payment, referral earnings, coordination, deliberate deception and control of the trading account are not established.
@parksajan
Called a winning combo’s $175.77 payout profit. After the $78.99 entry cost, the cash gain was $96.78 before gas.
Read the record for @parksajan→In fairness
This was a real winning combo. The card’s confusing labels could explain the wording; deliberate deception or payment for the post is not established.
This is one combo, not the whole account’s result or an established pattern. The available nearby posts do not establish whether a correction appeared later.
@qkl2058
Promoted $24 and $25 weather bets returning over $12,000. The complete paired trades made about $4,113 and $837 before gas.
Read the record for @qkl2058→In fairness
The figures shown are real, and the trader made money. The posts describe individual trades, not an account that began with $24 or $25. Cumulative purchases are not money tied up all at once.
A misunderstanding remains possible. Payment, referral earnings, coordination, deliberate deception and control of the trading account are not established.
@slash1sol
Urged readers to copy a bot after a claimed $25 became $12,420. The examples omitted the other side of the trades.
Read the record for @slash1sol→In fairness
The trader made money. The screenshots are real, and cumulative purchases are not the amount tied up all at once.
Misunderstanding remains possible. Link earnings, paid promotion and deliberate deception are not established.
@vadim_kesha1
Calls a FaZe win the start of its Polymarket journey, but the profile was funded from an older account then about $5,000 down.
Read the record for @vadim_kesha1→In fairness
It marked three of its seven DG3 posts since August 2026 as paid partnerships, and wrote 'when unsure, add paid partnership'.
It later wrote 'i ended up down $13,000'. The older account is public and carries a near-identical name.
@vijn_crypto
Used an account-wide profit graph for a $50 challenge. The complete recorded fifteen-minute sequence needed at least $414.
Read the record for @vijn_crypto→In fairness
The account’s positive profit graph is real. A selected set of trades or another wallet cannot be ruled out.
The cash test covers the whole recorded fifteen-minute sequence. Later deposits may recycle earlier withdrawals.