Called a winning combo’s $175.77 payout profit. After the $78.99 entry cost, the cash gain was $96.78 before gas.
The July 2 post called a winning combo’s $175.77 payout profit. The linked wallet paid $78.99 including its entry fee, leaving $96.78 before gas. Its app card also labels $175.77 as cost, profit and payout, making a display or terminology error plausible.
In fairness
This was a real winning combo. The card’s confusing labels could explain the wording; deliberate deception or payment for the post is not established.
This is one combo, not the whole account’s result or an established pattern. The available nearby posts do not establish whether a correction appeared later.
Show the record3 points and their sources
What the record shows
1The post says the combo made “$175.77 profit”. Its own card shows the same $175.77 under Cost, Profit and Payout.
The handle’s own attached card uses the same figure for cost, profit and payout.
1 more source
2The wallet linked on the public profile paid $77.69 plus a $1.30 entry fee. That bought the exact position shown in the card.
3 more sources
3Redeeming that position returned $175.77. Subtracting the $78.99 entry cost leaves a $96.78 cash gain before gas.
3 more sources
Accounts tied to @parksajan
Everything that must be said with these points
- This was a genuine winning and profitable combo. This concerns one payout-versus-profit description, not fabrication or a losing bet.
- The app card uses the same $175.77 for Cost, Profit and Payout. Confusing app terminology or a display error could explain the post’s wording; deliberate deception is not established.
- The purchase cost includes the 1.300530 pUSD fee. The 96.778700 pUSD figure is this combo’s net cash before gas, not a whole-account result.
- The API identifies the same three fixtures and O/U 1.5 markets; the own card supplies the Over 1.5 directions. No independent API combo-leg direction definition was verified. Exact asset, wallet, timing and cash support the match.
- The primary full bytes32 combo ID and the shorter API conditionId are distinct fields. The exact asset matches the activity to the chain records; the two identifiers are not treated as identical.
- Only three nearby own-post archives were recovered. The July 3 post says “$58.85 into $166.78” for a different combo; no repeated pattern or absence-of-correction claim follows from this small sample.
- There is no evidence here of knowing deception, compensation for promotion, undisclosed income, referral earnings, follower losses or common control. The historical paid-partnership field is not readable for this post.
